GeForce GTX 460 SE vs GeForce MX350
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 460 SE and GeForce MX350, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 460 SE stacks up against GeForce MX350, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce MX350 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX350 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX350 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 SE | GeForce MX350 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 20 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 SE has 650% more power consumption, than GeForce MX350.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce MX350 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce MX350 has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is used in Desktops, and GeForce MX350 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is build with Fermi architecture, and GeForce MX350 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX350 is 54 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce MX350 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX350 is 5300 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 58% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Battlefield 5 is 68% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 460 SE and GeForce MX350 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 100−105 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 34% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Dota 2 is 32% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Far Cry 5 is 75% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Fortnite is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Forza Horizon 4 is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Grand Theft Auto V is 36% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Metro Exodus is 62% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Minecraft is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 29% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 30% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 52% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in World of Tanks is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 SE | GeForce MX350 | |
Architecture | Fermi | Pascal |
Code name | GF104 | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 15 November 2010 | 20 February 2020 |
Pipelines | 288 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 1300 MHz | 1354 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1468 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 3,300 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 31.2 billion/sec | 29.98 |
Floating-point performance | 748.8 gflops | |
Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz | 7000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 108.8 GB/s | 56.06 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | 6.1 |
CUDA cores | 288 | |
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | |
Optimus | + | |
Number of display connectors | 2 | |
Check Price |