GeForce GTX 460 SE vs GRID K240Q
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 460 SE and GRID K240Q, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 460 SE stacks up against GRID K240Q, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
GRID K240Q
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 SE | GRID K240Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
- GRID K240Q has 50% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GRID K240Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE and GRID K240Q have maximum RAM of 1 GB.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is build with Fermi architecture, and GRID K240Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 555 MHz higher, than GRID K240Q.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GRID K240Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K240Q is 3300 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Battlefield 5 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 460 SE and GRID K240Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 170−180 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 140−150 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Dota 2 is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Far Cry 5 is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Fortnite is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Metro Exodus is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−105 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Minecraft is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 20−22 |
GeForce GTX 460 SE and GRID K240Q have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
GeForce GTX 460 SE and GRID K240Q have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in World of Tanks is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 SE | GRID K240Q | |
Architecture | Fermi | Kepler |
Code name | GF104 | GK104 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Release date | 15 November 2010 | 28 June 2013 |
Pipelines | 288 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 1300 MHz | 745 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 31.2 billion/sec | 95.36 |
Floating-point performance | 748.8 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 108.8 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | 3.0 |
CUDA cores | 288 | |
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | |
Number of display connectors | 2 | |