GeForce GTX 460 SE vs GRID M60 1Q
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 460 SE and GRID M60 1Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 460 SE will be the best choice, for others GRID M60 1Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
GRID M60 1Q
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 SE | GRID M60 1Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
- GRID M60 1Q has 50% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GRID M60 1Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE and GRID M60 1Q have maximum RAM of 1 GB.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is build with Fermi architecture, and GRID M60 1Q - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 743 MHz higher, than GRID M60 1Q.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GRID M60 1Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- GRID M60 1Q is 259 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M60 1Q is 3312 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 116% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Battlefield 5 is 131% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 230−240 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 200−210 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 120−130 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 100−105 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 170−180 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 32% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Dota 2 is 52% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 20−22 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Far Cry 5 is 141% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Fortnite is 102% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 116% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 73% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Metro Exodus is 125% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Minecraft is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 42% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 76% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 117% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in World of Tanks is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 SE | GRID M60 1Q | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | GF104 | GM204 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 15 November 2010 | 30 August 2015 |
| Pipelines | 288 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 1300 MHz | 557 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | 5,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 31.2 billion/sec | 150.8 |
| Floating-point performance | 748.8 gflops | 4,833 gflops |
| Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | 267 mm |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 108.8 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 5.2 |
| CUDA cores | 288 | |
| Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | |
| Number of display connectors | 2 | |