GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Iris Plus Graphics 650
When comparing GeForce GTX 460 SE and Iris Plus Graphics 650, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 460 SE and Iris Plus Graphics 650 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 650 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 650 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 SE | Iris Plus Graphics 650 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 32 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 SE has 900% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 has 31 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is build with Fermi architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 1000 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Battlefield 5 is 5% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 460 SE and Iris Plus Graphics 650 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 8% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Dota 2 is 7% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Far Cry 5 is 9% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Fortnite is 9% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Forza Horizon 4 is 12% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Grand Theft Auto V is 11% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Metro Exodus is 33% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Minecraft is 4% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 9% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 8% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 13% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 SE | Iris Plus Graphics 650 | |
Architecture | Fermi | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake |
Code name | GF104 | Kaby Lake GT3e |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 15 November 2010 | 3 January 2017 |
Pipelines | 288 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 1300 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 31.2 billion/sec | 55.20 |
Floating-point performance | 748.8 gflops | 883 gflops |
Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 108.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.103 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 288 | |
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Number of display connectors | 2 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs GeForce GTX 470M
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Quadro M600M
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs GeForce GTX 470M
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs Quadro M600M
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Radeon R9 M385X
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs GeForce GTX 650
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs Radeon R9 M385X
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs GeForce GTX 650