GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200
When comparing GeForce GTX 460 SE and Iris Pro Graphics 5200, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 460 SE and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 SE | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 45 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | eDRAM |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 128 MB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 SE has 233% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 uses PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 127 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is build with Fermi architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - with Gen. 7.5 Haswell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 1100 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - by 22 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
GeForce GTX 460 SE and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
GeForce GTX 460 SE and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 460 SE and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 1% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
GeForce GTX 460 SE and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Dota 2 is 1% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
GeForce GTX 460 SE and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
GeForce GTX 460 SE and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 have the same average FPS in Fortnite. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Forza Horizon 4 is 5% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Grand Theft Auto V is 5% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
GeForce GTX 460 SE and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Minecraft is 2% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 4% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 8% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 6% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
GeForce GTX 460 SE and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 SE | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | |
Architecture | Fermi | Gen. 7.5 Haswell |
Code name | GF104 | Haswell GT3e |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 15 November 2010 | 5 June 2013 |
Pipelines | 288 | 40 |
Core clock speed | 1300 MHz | 200 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1300 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 392 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 22 nm |
Texture fill rate | 31.2 billion/sec | 52.00 |
Floating-point performance | 748.8 gflops | 104.0 gflops |
Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 108.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.3 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.80 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 288 | |
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Number of display connectors | 2 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs GeForce GTX 470M
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Quadro M600M
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs GeForce GTX 470M
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Quadro M600M
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Radeon RX 550X
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon RX 550X
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book