GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 460 SE and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 460 SE stacks up against Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 SE | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is used in Desktops, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is build with Fermi architecture, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 900 MHz higher, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 116% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Battlefield 5 is 142% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 120−130 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 170−180 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Cyberpunk 2077 is 37% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Dota 2 is 55% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 20−22 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Far Cry 5 is 150% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Fortnite is 102% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Forza Horizon 4 is 122% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Grand Theft Auto V is 81% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Metro Exodus is 125% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Minecraft is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 42% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 76% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 123% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in World of Tanks is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 SE | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
Architecture | Fermi | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
Code name | GF104 | Tiger Lake Xe |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 15 November 2010 | 15 August 2020 |
Pipelines | 288 | 96 |
Core clock speed | 1300 MHz | 400 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1350 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 10 nm |
Texture fill rate | 31.2 billion/sec | |
Floating-point performance | 748.8 gflops | |
Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 108.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.1 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 288 | |
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Number of display connectors | 2 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs GeForce GTX 470M
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Quadro M600M
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs GeForce GTX 470M
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Quadro M600M
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Radeon R9 M395
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon R9 M395