GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Quadro 5000M
When comparing GeForce GTX 460 SE and Quadro 5000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 460 SE and Quadro 5000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
Quadro 5000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 5000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 5000M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 SE | Quadro 5000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 SE has 50% more power consumption, than Quadro 5000M.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro 5000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Quadro 5000M has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is used in Desktops, and Quadro 5000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE and Quadro 5000M are build with Fermi architecture.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 895 MHz higher, than Quadro 5000M.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE and Quadro 5000M are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 500 MHz higher, than Quadro 5000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Battlefield 5 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 460 SE and Quadro 5000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 170−180 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 140−150 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Dota 2 is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Far Cry 5 is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Fortnite is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 460 SE and Quadro 5000M have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| GeForce GTX 460 SE and Quadro 5000M have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
| GeForce GTX 460 SE and Quadro 5000M have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 20−22 |
| GeForce GTX 460 SE and Quadro 5000M have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| GeForce GTX 460 SE and Quadro 5000M have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| GeForce GTX 460 SE and Quadro 5000M have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in World of Tanks is 1% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 SE | Quadro 5000M | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Fermi |
| Code name | GF104 | Fermi |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 15 November 2010 | 27 July 2010 |
| Pipelines | 288 | 320 |
| Core clock speed | 1300 MHz | 405 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 31.2 billion/sec | 16.20 |
| Floating-point performance | 748.8 gflops | 518.4 gflops |
| Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 108.8 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | + | + |
| CUDA cores | 288 | |
| Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Number of display connectors | 2 | |
| Check Price |