GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Quadro 5010M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 460 SE and Quadro 5010M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 460 SE stacks up against Quadro 5010M, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
Quadro 5010M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 5010M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 5010M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 SE | Quadro 5010M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 ECC |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 SE has 50% more power consumption, than Quadro 5010M.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro 5010M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Quadro 5010M has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is used in Desktops, and Quadro 5010M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE and Quadro 5010M are build with Fermi architecture.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 850 MHz higher, than Quadro 5010M.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE and Quadro 5010M are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 400 MHz higher, than Quadro 5010M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| GeForce GTX 460 SE and Quadro 5010M have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Battlefield 5 is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 460 SE and Quadro 5010M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 160−170 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 1% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| GeForce GTX 460 SE and Quadro 5010M have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| GeForce GTX 460 SE and Quadro 5010M have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Fortnite is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| GeForce GTX 460 SE and Quadro 5010M have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 460 SE and Quadro 5010M have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| GeForce GTX 460 SE and Quadro 5010M have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
| GeForce GTX 460 SE and Quadro 5010M have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 20−22 |
| GeForce GTX 460 SE and Quadro 5010M have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| GeForce GTX 460 SE and Quadro 5010M have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| GeForce GTX 460 SE and Quadro 5010M have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| GeForce GTX 460 SE and Quadro 5010M have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 SE | Quadro 5010M | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Fermi |
| Code name | GF104 | N12E-Q5 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 15 November 2010 | 22 February 2011 |
| Pipelines | 288 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 1300 MHz | 450 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | 3,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 31.2 billion/sec | 21.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 748.8 gflops | 691.2 gflops |
| Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 108.8 GB/s | 83.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | + | 2.0 |
| CUDA cores | 288 | |
| Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Number of display connectors | 2 | |
| Check Price |