GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Quadro K2200M
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 460 SE and Quadro K2200M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 460 SE will be the best choice, for others Quadro K2200M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
Quadro K2200M
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 SE | Quadro K2200M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
- GeForce GTX 460 SE has 130% more power consumption, than Quadro K2200M.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K2200M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Quadro K2200M has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro K2200M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 633 MHz higher, than Quadro K2200M.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K2200M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K2200M is 3312 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Battlefield 5 is 115% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 230−240 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 200−210 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 85−90 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 160−170 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 57% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 32% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Dota 2 is 45% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Far Cry 5 is 116% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Fortnite is 85% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Forza Horizon 4 is 94% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Grand Theft Auto V is 68% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Metro Exodus is 112% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Minecraft is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 34% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 61% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 94% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in World of Tanks is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 SE | Quadro K2200M | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Maxwell |
| Code name | GF104 | GM107 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 15 November 2010 | 19 July 2014 |
| Pipelines | 288 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 1300 MHz | 667 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 31.2 billion/sec | 26.68 |
| Floating-point performance | 748.8 gflops | 853.8 gflops |
| Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 108.8 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5 |
| OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 5.0 |
| CUDA cores | 288 | |
| Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Number of display connectors | 2 | |