GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Quadro K3000M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 460 SE and Quadro K3000M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 460 SE stacks up against Quadro K3000M, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
Quadro K3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K3000M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 SE | Quadro K3000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 SE has 100% more power consumption, than Quadro K3000M.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K3000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Quadro K3000M has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is used in Desktops, and Quadro K3000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro K3000M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 646 MHz higher, than Quadro K3000M.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K3000M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K3000M is 1100 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Battlefield 5 is 18% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 460 SE and Quadro K3000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 12% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Dota 2 is 9% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Far Cry 5 is 9% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Fortnite is 9% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Forza Horizon 4 is 20% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Grand Theft Auto V is 15% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Metro Exodus is 28% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Minecraft is 6% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 9% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 18% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 21% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in World of Tanks is 10% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 SE | Quadro K3000M | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Kepler |
| Code name | GF104 | N14E-Q1 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 15 November 2010 | 1 June 2012 |
| Pipelines | 288 | 576 |
| Core clock speed | 1300 MHz | 654 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 31.2 billion/sec | 31.39 |
| Floating-point performance | 748.8 gflops | 753.4 gflops |
| Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz | 2800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 108.8 GB/s | 89.6 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | + |
| CUDA cores | 288 | |
| Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | 24 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Number of display connectors | 2 | |
| Check Price |