GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Quadro K4000M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 460 SE and Quadro K4000M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 460 SE and Quadro K4000M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
Quadro K4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K4000M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 SE | Quadro K4000M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 SE has 50% more power consumption, than Quadro K4000M.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K4000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Quadro K4000M has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is used in Desktops, and Quadro K4000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro K4000M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 700 MHz higher, than Quadro K4000M.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K4000M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K4000M is 1100 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Battlefield 5 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 460 SE and Quadro K4000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 170−180 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 140−150 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Dota 2 is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Far Cry 5 is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Fortnite is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Metro Exodus is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
GeForce GTX 460 SE and Quadro K4000M have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 20−22 |
GeForce GTX 460 SE and Quadro K4000M have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
GeForce GTX 460 SE and Quadro K4000M have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in World of Tanks is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 SE | Quadro K4000M | |
Architecture | Fermi | Kepler |
Code name | GF104 | N14E-Q3 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 15 November 2010 | 1 June 2012 |
Pipelines | 288 | 960 |
Core clock speed | 1300 MHz | 600 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 31.2 billion/sec | 48.08 |
Floating-point performance | 748.8 gflops | 1,154 gflops |
Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz | 2800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 108.8 GB/s | 89.6 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | + |
CUDA cores | 288 | |
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | 37 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Number of display connectors | 2 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs GeForce GTX 470M
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Quadro M600M
- Quadro K4000M vs GeForce GTX 470M
- Quadro K4000M vs Quadro M600M
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Radeon RX Vega 11
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000
- Quadro K4000M vs Radeon RX Vega 11
- Quadro K4000M vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000