GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Quadro K4100M
When comparing GeForce GTX 460 SE and Quadro K4100M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 460 SE and Quadro K4100M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
Quadro K4100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K4100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K4100M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 SE | Quadro K4100M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 SE has 50% more power consumption, than Quadro K4100M.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K4100M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Quadro K4100M has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is used in Desktops, and Quadro K4100M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro K4100M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 594 MHz higher, than Quadro K4100M.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K4100M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K4100M is 1500 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Battlefield 5 is 31% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 460 SE and Quadro K4100M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 180−190 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 150−160 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 80−85 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Dota 2 is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Far Cry 5 is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Fortnite is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Forza Horizon 4 is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Grand Theft Auto V is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Minecraft is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in World of Tanks is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 SE | Quadro K4100M | |
Architecture | Fermi | Kepler |
Code name | GF104 | N15E-Q3-A2 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 15 November 2010 | 23 July 2013 |
Pipelines | 288 | 1152 |
Core clock speed | 1300 MHz | 706 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 31.2 billion/sec | 67.78 |
Floating-point performance | 748.8 gflops | 1,627 gflops |
Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz | 3200 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 108.8 GB/s | 102.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5 |
OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | + |
CUDA cores | 288 | |
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | 51 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Number of display connectors | 2 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs GeForce GTX 470M
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Quadro M600M
- Quadro K4100M vs GeForce GTX 470M
- Quadro K4100M vs Quadro M600M
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Iris Plus Graphics 655
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs GeForce GT 650M SLI
- Quadro K4100M vs Iris Plus Graphics 655
- Quadro K4100M vs GeForce GT 650M SLI