GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Quadro M1000M
When choosing between GeForce GTX 460 SE and Quadro M1000M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 460 SE and Quadro M1000M.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro M1000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M1000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M1000M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 SE | Quadro M1000M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 40 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB/4 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 SE has 275% more power consumption, than Quadro M1000M.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro M1000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Quadro M1000M has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is used in Desktops, and Quadro M1000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro M1000M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 307 MHz higher, than Quadro M1000M.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro M1000M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M1000M is 3300 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 58% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Battlefield 5 is 68% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 460 SE and Quadro M1000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 100−105 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 34% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Dota 2 is 32% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Far Cry 5 is 75% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Fortnite is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 36% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Metro Exodus is 62% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Minecraft is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 29% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 30% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 52% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in World of Tanks is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 SE | Quadro M1000M | |
Architecture | Fermi | Maxwell |
Code name | GF104 | GM107 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 15 November 2010 | 2 October 2015 |
Pipelines | 288 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 1300 MHz | 993 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1072 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 31.2 billion/sec | 31.78 |
Floating-point performance | 748.8 gflops | 1,017 gflops |
Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 108.8 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | 5.0 |
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) | 0.22 kh/s | |
CUDA cores | 288 | |
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | 140 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Number of display connectors | 2 | |
Check Price |