GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Quadro P500
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 460 SE and Quadro P500. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 460 SE and Quadro P500. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
Quadro P500 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro P500 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro P500 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 SE | Quadro P500 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | 3x mini-DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 SE has 400% more power consumption, than Quadro P500.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro P500 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro P500 has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is used in Desktops, and Quadro P500 - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro P500 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of Quadro P500 is 155 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro P500 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro P500 is 3312 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Battlefield 5 is 5% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 460 SE and Quadro P500 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 150−160 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 8% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Dota 2 is 7% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Far Cry 5 is 9% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Fortnite is 9% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Forza Horizon 4 is 12% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Grand Theft Auto V is 15% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Metro Exodus is 33% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Minecraft is 4% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 9% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 8% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 30−33 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 13% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 SE | Quadro P500 | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Pascal |
| Code name | GF104 | GP108 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 15 November 2010 | 14 November 2017 |
| Pipelines | 288 | 256 |
| Core clock speed | 1300 MHz | 1455 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1519 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | 1,800 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 31.2 billion/sec | 21.25 |
| Floating-point performance | 748.8 gflops | 679.9 gflops |
| Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 108.8 GB/s | 32.1 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12.1 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.0.1 |
| CUDA | + | 6.1 |
| CUDA cores | 288 | |
| Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Number of display connectors | 2 | |
| Check Price |