GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Quadro T2000 mobile
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 460 SE and Quadro T2000 mobile you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 460 SE will be the best choice, for others Quadro T2000 mobile will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro T2000 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro T2000 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro T2000 mobile here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 SE | Quadro T2000 mobile | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 60 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 SE has 150% more power consumption, than Quadro T2000 mobile.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro T2000 mobile uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro T2000 mobile has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is used in Desktops, and Quadro T2000 mobile - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro T2000 mobile - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of Quadro T2000 mobile is 275 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro T2000 mobile - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro T2000 mobile is 6300 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 241% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Battlefield 5 is 257% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 96% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Dota 2 is 64% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Far Cry 5 is 291% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Fortnite is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Forza Horizon 4 is 250% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 144% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Metro Exodus is 287% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Minecraft is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 176% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 264% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in World of Tanks is 26% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 SE | Quadro T2000 mobile | |
Architecture | Fermi | Turing |
Code name | GF104 | N19P-Q3 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 15 November 2010 | 27 May 2019 |
Pipelines | 288 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 1300 MHz | 1575 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1785 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 4,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 12 nm |
Texture fill rate | 31.2 billion/sec | 114.2 |
Floating-point performance | 748.8 gflops | |
Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz | 8000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 108.8 GB/s | 128.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | 7.5 |
CUDA cores | 288 | |
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Number of display connectors | 2 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs GeForce GTX 470M
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Quadro M600M
- Quadro T2000 mobile vs GeForce GTX 470M
- Quadro T2000 mobile vs Quadro M600M
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Radeon R9 380X
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire
- Quadro T2000 mobile vs Radeon R9 380X
- Quadro T2000 mobile vs Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire