GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Radeon 540X
When comparing GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon 540X, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon 540X is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
Radeon 540X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon 540X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon 540X here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 SE | Radeon 540X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 SE has 200% more power consumption, than Radeon 540X.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon 540X uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon 540X has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is used in Desktops, and Radeon 540X - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon 540X - with GCN 4.0.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon 540X - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon 540X is 4300 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than Radeon 540X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Battlefield 5 is 46% more, than Radeon 540X. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon 540X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 33% more, than Radeon 540X. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Radeon 540X. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Dota 2 is 27% more, than Radeon 540X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than Radeon 540X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Fortnite is 30% more, than Radeon 540X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Forza Horizon 4 is 46% more, than Radeon 540X. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Grand Theft Auto V is 35% more, than Radeon 540X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than Radeon 540X. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Minecraft is 12% more, than Radeon 540X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 20% more, than Radeon 540X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 44% more, than Radeon 540X. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 53% more, than Radeon 540X. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in World of Tanks is 15% more, than Radeon 540X. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 SE | Radeon 540X | |
| Architecture | Fermi | GCN 4.0 |
| Code name | GF104 | Lexa |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 15 November 2010 | 12 August 2019 |
| Pipelines | 288 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 1300 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1219 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | 2,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 31.2 billion/sec | 33.47 |
| Floating-point performance | 748.8 gflops | |
| Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz | 6000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 108.8 GB/s | 112.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 288 | |
| Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | |
| Number of display connectors | 2 | |
| Check Price |