GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Radeon HD 6850M
When choosing between GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon HD 6850M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon HD 6850M.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
Radeon HD 6850M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 6850M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 6850M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 SE | Radeon HD 6850M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 50 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 SE has 200% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 6850M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon HD 6850M have maximum RAM of 1 GB.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 6850M - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon HD 6850M - with Terascale 2.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 725 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 6850M.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon HD 6850M are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 900 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 6850M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than Radeon HD 6850M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Battlefield 5 is 150% more, than Radeon HD 6850M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6850M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 47% more, than Radeon HD 6850M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6850M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Dota 2 is 42% more, than Radeon HD 6850M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Far Cry 5 is 140% more, than Radeon HD 6850M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Fortnite is 70% more, than Radeon HD 6850M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Forza Horizon 4 is 140% more, than Radeon HD 6850M. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | − |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Grand Theft Auto V is 72% more, than Radeon HD 6850M. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Metro Exodus is 266% more, than Radeon HD 6850M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Minecraft is 14% more, than Radeon HD 6850M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 41% more, than Radeon HD 6850M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 160% more, than Radeon HD 6850M. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 233% more, than Radeon HD 6850M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in World of Tanks is 29% more, than Radeon HD 6850M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 SE | Radeon HD 6850M | |
Architecture | Fermi | Terascale 2 |
Code name | GF104 | Granville Pro/LP |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 15 November 2010 | 6 January 2011 |
Pipelines | 288 | 800 |
Core clock speed | 1300 MHz | 575 / 675 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 1,040 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 31.2 billion/sec | 27.00 |
Floating-point performance | 748.8 gflops | 1,080.0 gflops |
Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz | 800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 108.8 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 288 | |
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Number of display connectors | 2 | |
Check Price |