GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Radeon HD 6950M
When comparing GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon HD 6950M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon HD 6950M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
Radeon HD 6950M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 6950M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 6950M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 SE | Radeon HD 6950M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 50 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 SE has 200% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 6950M.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon HD 6950M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Radeon HD 6950M has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 6950M - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon HD 6950M - with Terascale 2.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 720 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 6950M.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon HD 6950M are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 800 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 6950M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 9% more, than Radeon HD 6950M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon HD 6950M have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon HD 6950M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 5% more, than Radeon HD 6950M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon HD 6950M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Dota 2 is 7% more, than Radeon HD 6950M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon HD 6950M have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Fortnite is 3% more, than Radeon HD 6950M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Forza Horizon 4 is 12% more, than Radeon HD 6950M. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Grand Theft Auto V is 11% more, than Radeon HD 6950M. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Metro Exodus is 14% more, than Radeon HD 6950M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Minecraft is 4% more, than Radeon HD 6950M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 9% more, than Radeon HD 6950M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 8% more, than Radeon HD 6950M. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 6% more, than Radeon HD 6950M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Radeon HD 6950M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 SE | Radeon HD 6950M | |
Architecture | Fermi | Terascale 2 |
Code name | GF104 | Blackcomb Pro |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 15 November 2010 | 6 January 2011 |
Pipelines | 288 | 960 |
Core clock speed | 1300 MHz | 580 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 1,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 31.2 billion/sec | 27.84 |
Floating-point performance | 748.8 gflops | 1,113.6 gflops |
Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz | 900 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 108.8 GB/s | 115.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 288 | |
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Number of display connectors | 2 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs GeForce GTX 470M
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Quadro M600M
- Radeon HD 6950M vs GeForce GTX 470M
- Radeon HD 6950M vs Quadro M600M
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs GeForce GT 755M
- Radeon HD 6950M vs Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
- Radeon HD 6950M vs GeForce GT 755M