GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 SE | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2x2 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | |
Check Price |
- Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire - with Terascale 2.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 620 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 800 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 108% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Battlefield 5 is 121% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 120−130 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 95−100 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 170−180 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 64% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Cyberpunk 2077 is 32% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Dota 2 is 48% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 20−22 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Far Cry 5 is 125% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Fortnite is 85% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Forza Horizon 4 is 116% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Grand Theft Auto V is 71% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Metro Exodus is 112% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Minecraft is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 34% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 76% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in World of Tanks is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 SE | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire | |
Architecture | Fermi | Terascale 2 |
Code name | GF104 | Blackcomb XT |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 15 November 2010 | 6 January 2011 |
Pipelines | 288 | 1920 |
Core clock speed | 1300 MHz | 680 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 2x1700 Million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 31.2 billion/sec | |
Floating-point performance | 748.8 gflops | |
Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz | 900 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 108.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 11, Shader 5.0 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.1 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 288 | |
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Number of display connectors | 2 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs GeForce GTX 470M
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Quadro M600M
- Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire vs GeForce GTX 470M
- Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire vs Quadro M600M
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs FirePro S9050
- Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire vs FirePro S9050