GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Radeon HD 6990M
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon HD 6990M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 460 SE will be the best choice, for others Radeon HD 6990M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
Radeon HD 6990M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 6990M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 6990M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 SE | Radeon HD 6990M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 SE has 50% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 6990M.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon HD 6990M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Radeon HD 6990M has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 6990M - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon HD 6990M - with Terascale 2.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 585 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 6990M.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon HD 6990M are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 800 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 6990M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M in Battlefield 5 is 47% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon HD 6990M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M in Dota 2 is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M in Far Cry 5 is 58% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M in Fortnite is 41% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M in Forza Horizon 4 is 44% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M in Grand Theft Auto V is 26% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M in Minecraft is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 30% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 41% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−105 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M in World of Tanks is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 SE | Radeon HD 6990M | |
Architecture | Fermi | Terascale 2 |
Code name | GF104 | Blackcomb XTX |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 15 November 2010 | 12 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 288 | 1120 |
Core clock speed | 1300 MHz | 715 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 1,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 31.2 billion/sec | 40.04 |
Floating-point performance | 748.8 gflops | 1,601.6 gflops |
Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz | 900 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 108.8 GB/s | 115.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 288 | |
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Number of display connectors | 2 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs GeForce GTX 470M
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Quadro M600M
- Radeon HD 6990M vs GeForce GTX 470M
- Radeon HD 6990M vs Quadro M600M
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- Radeon HD 6990M vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti
- Radeon HD 6990M vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI