GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Radeon HD 7750M
When comparing GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon HD 7750M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon HD 7750M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon HD 7750M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 7750M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 7750M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 SE | Radeon HD 7750M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 28 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 SE has 435% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 7750M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon HD 7750M has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 7750M - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon HD 7750M - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 725 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 7750M.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 7750M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon HD 7750M is 2300 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Radeon HD 7750M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Battlefield 5 is 90% more, than Radeon HD 7750M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon HD 7750M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 41% more, than Radeon HD 7750M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7750M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Dota 2 is 29% more, than Radeon HD 7750M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Far Cry 5 is 150% more, than Radeon HD 7750M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Fortnite is 47% more, than Radeon HD 7750M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Forza Horizon 4 is 120% more, than Radeon HD 7750M. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | − |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Grand Theft Auto V is 63% more, than Radeon HD 7750M. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Metro Exodus is 175% more, than Radeon HD 7750M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Minecraft is 20% more, than Radeon HD 7750M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than Radeon HD 7750M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 116% more, than Radeon HD 7750M. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 112% more, than Radeon HD 7750M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in World of Tanks is 35% more, than Radeon HD 7750M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 SE | Radeon HD 7750M | |
Architecture | Fermi | GCN |
Code name | GF104 | Lombok XL |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 15 November 2010 | 24 April 2012 |
Pipelines | 288 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 1300 MHz | 575 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 31.2 billion/sec | 18.40 |
Floating-point performance | 748.8 gflops | 588.8 gflops |
Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 108.8 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 288 | |
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Number of display connectors | 2 | |
Check Price |