GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Radeon HD 8770M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon HD 8770M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon HD 8770M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
Radeon HD 8770M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 8770M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 8770M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 SE | Radeon HD 8770M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon HD 8770M uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon HD 8770M has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 8770M - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon HD 8770M - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 525 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 8770M.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 8770M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon HD 8770M is 2800 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than Radeon HD 8770M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Battlefield 5 is 26% more, than Radeon HD 8770M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon HD 8770M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 30−33 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 18% more, than Radeon HD 8770M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Radeon HD 8770M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Dota 2 is 16% more, than Radeon HD 8770M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Far Cry 5 is 33% more, than Radeon HD 8770M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Fortnite is 21% more, than Radeon HD 8770M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Forza Horizon 4 is 38% more, than Radeon HD 8770M. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Grand Theft Auto V is 31% more, than Radeon HD 8770M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Metro Exodus is 28% more, than Radeon HD 8770M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Minecraft is 8% more, than Radeon HD 8770M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 20% more, than Radeon HD 8770M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 30% more, than Radeon HD 8770M. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 30% more, than Radeon HD 8770M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in World of Tanks is 10% more, than Radeon HD 8770M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 SE | Radeon HD 8770M | |
| Architecture | Fermi | GCN |
| Code name | GF104 | Mars |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 15 November 2010 | 16 November 2012 |
| Pipelines | 288 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 1300 MHz | 775 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 825 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | 950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 31.2 billion/sec | 19.80 |
| Floating-point performance | 748.8 gflops | 633.6 gflops |
| Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz | 4500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 108.8 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 288 | |
| Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Number of display connectors | 2 | |
| Check Price |