GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Radeon Pro WX 4150
When choosing between GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon Pro WX 4150, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon Pro WX 4150.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
Radeon Pro WX 4150 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro WX 4150 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro WX 4150 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 SE | Radeon Pro WX 4150 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | |
| Check Price |
- Radeon Pro WX 4150 has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro WX 4150 - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon Pro WX 4150 - with Polaris.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro WX 4150 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 4150 is 5300 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon Pro WX 4150 have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4150 in Battlefield 5 is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon Pro WX 4150 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 160−170 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4150 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 1% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4150 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon Pro WX 4150 have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon Pro WX 4150 have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4150 in Fortnite is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon Pro WX 4150 have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon Pro WX 4150 have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon Pro WX 4150 have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
| GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon Pro WX 4150 have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 20−22 |
| GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon Pro WX 4150 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon Pro WX 4150 have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon Pro WX 4150 have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon Pro WX 4150 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 SE | Radeon Pro WX 4150 | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Polaris |
| Code name | GF104 | Polaris 11 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 15 November 2010 | 1 March 2017 |
| Pipelines | 288 | 896 |
| Core clock speed | 1300 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1053 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 31.2 billion/sec | |
| Floating-point performance | 748.8 gflops | |
| Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz | 7000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 108.8 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.1 | |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | + | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| CUDA cores | 288 | |
| Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Number of display connectors | 2 | |
| Check Price |