GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 460 SE will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 SE | Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 65 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | IGP |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | HBM2 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 SE has 130% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL uses IGP interface.
- Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL - with Vega.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 369 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 300 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 241% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Battlefield 5 is 257% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 96% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Dota 2 is 64% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Far Cry 5 is 291% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Fortnite is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Forza Horizon 4 is 250% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Grand Theft Auto V is 144% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Metro Exodus is 287% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Minecraft is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 176% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 264% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in World of Tanks is 26% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 SE | Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL | |
Architecture | Fermi | Vega |
Code name | GF104 | Vega Kaby Lake-G |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 15 November 2010 | 7 January 2018 |
Pipelines | 288 | 1280 |
Core clock speed | 1300 MHz | 931 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1011 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 5,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 31.2 billion/sec | 80.88 |
Floating-point performance | 748.8 gflops | |
Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 1024 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz | 1400 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 108.8 GB/s | 179.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 288 | |
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Number of display connectors | 2 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs GeForce GTX 470M
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Quadro M600M
- Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL vs GeForce GTX 470M
- Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL vs Quadro M600M
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
- Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL vs Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire
- Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL vs GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q