GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Radeon R9 A375

In this comparison between GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon R9 A375 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 460 SE will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 A375 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

GeForce GTX 460 SE

Radeon R9 A375

Main Specs

	GeForce GTX 460 SE	Radeon R9 A375
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	6-pin & 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI	No outputs

GeForce GTX 460 SE is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R9 A375 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Radeon R9 A375 has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GeForce GTX 460 SE is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon R9 A375 - with GCN 1.0.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 400 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 A375.
GeForce GTX 460 SE is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 A375 - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 1696 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 A375.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	9−10	2−3
ultra / 1080p	5−6	1−2
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	21−24	12−14
medium / 1080p	12−14	4−5
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
high / 1080p	16−18	−
ultra / 1080p	12−14	5−6
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	30−35	16−18
medium / 1080p	16−18	6−7
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Battlefield 5 is 122% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	−	40−45
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
low / 768p	160−170	120−130
medium / 768p	130−140	95−100
ultra / 1080p	65−70	40−45
QHD / 1440p	40−45	21−24
4K / 2160p	27−30	16−18
high / 768p	100−110	65−70
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 45% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
low / 768p	55−60	65−70
ultra / 1080p	24−27	20−22
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
low / 768p	90−95	75−80
medium / 768p	70−75	45−50
ultra / 1080p	45−50	21−24
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Dota 2 is 42% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
high / 1080p	10−12	2−3
ultra / 1080p	10−11	2−3
4K / 2160p	4−5	2−3
low / 720p	24−27	10−12
medium / 1080p	12−14	4−5
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
high / 1080p	18−20	10−11
ultra / 1080p	12−14	5−6
QHD / 1440p	−	4−5
low / 720p	70−75	50−55
medium / 1080p	30−35	10−12
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Fortnite is 78% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
high / 1080p	16−18	5−6
ultra / 1080p	14−16	−
QHD / 1440p	4−5	3−4
4K / 2160p	−	2−3
low / 720p	35−40	18−20
medium / 1080p	18−20	8−9
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Forza Horizon 4 is 111% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
low / 768p	65−70	45−50
medium / 768p	55−60	−
high / 1080p	18−20	4−5
ultra / 1080p	8−9	2−3
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 720p	−	35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Grand Theft Auto V is 72% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
high / 1080p	6−7	2−3
ultra / 1080p	4−5	0−1
4K / 2160p	1−2	0−1
low / 720p	18−20	4−5
medium / 1080p	8−9	3−4
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Metro Exodus is 266% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
low / 768p	100−110	85−90
high / 1080p	−	80−85
ultra / 1080p	90−95	−
4K / 2160p	−	75−80
medium / 1080p	95−100	−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Minecraft is 20% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
high / 1080p	18−20	−
ultra / 1080p	14−16	12−14
low / 720p	40−45	27−30
medium / 1080p	20−22	14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
high / 1080p	12−14	−
ultra / 1080p	8−9	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	−
low / 720p	18−20	6−7
medium / 1080p	12−14	−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 216% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
low / 768p	35−40	10−11
medium / 768p	21−24	8−9
high / 1080p	12−14	4−5
ultra / 1080p	8−9	4−5
4K / 2160p	7−8	1−2
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 240% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
low / 768p	90−95	75−80
medium / 768p	50−55	35−40
ultra / 1080p	24−27	14−16
high / 768p	40−45	30−33
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in World of Tanks is 32% more, than Radeon R9 A375.

Full Specs

	GeForce GTX 460 SE	Radeon R9 A375
Architecture	Fermi	GCN 1.0
Code name	GF104	Venus
Type	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	15 November 2010	no data
Pipelines	288	640
Core clock speed	1300 MHz	900 MHz
Boost Clock		925 MHz
Transistor count	1,950 million	1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	31.2 billion/sec	37.00
Floating-point performance	748.8 gflops
Length	8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm)
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1700 MHz	4.5 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	108.8 GB/s	72 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.1	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.2
CUDA	+
CUDA cores	288
Bus support	16x PCI-E 2.0
Height	4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options	+
Multi monitor support	+
HDMI	+
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI	Internal
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	48 Mh/s
Number of display connectors	2

GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Radeon R9 A375

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares