GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Radeon R9 M385
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon R9 M385 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 460 SE will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 M385 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
Radeon R9 M385 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M385 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M385 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 SE | Radeon R9 M385 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R9 M385 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R9 M385 has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M385 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon R9 M385 - with GCN.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M385 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 200 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M385.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Battlefield 5 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon R9 M385 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 170−180 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 140−150 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Dota 2 is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Far Cry 5 is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Fortnite is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Forza Horizon 4 is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Grand Theft Auto V is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Metro Exodus is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−105 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Minecraft is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon R9 M385 have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in World of Tanks is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 SE | Radeon R9 M385 | |
Architecture | Fermi | GCN |
Code name | GF104 | Strato |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 15 November 2010 | 16 June 2015 |
Pipelines | 288 | 896 |
Core clock speed | 1300 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 2,080 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 31.2 billion/sec | 56.00 |
Floating-point performance | 748.8 gflops | 1,792 gflops |
Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 108.8 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | |
FreeSync | + | |
CUDA cores | 288 | |
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
TrueAudio | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Number of display connectors | 2 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs GeForce GTX 470M
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Quadro M600M
- Radeon R9 M385 vs GeForce GTX 470M
- Radeon R9 M385 vs Quadro M600M
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book 940M GDDR5
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs GeForce 945M
- Radeon R9 M385 vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book 940M GDDR5
- Radeon R9 M385 vs GeForce 945M