GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Radeon R9 M395X
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon R9 M395X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 460 SE will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 M395X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
Radeon R9 M395X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M395X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M395X here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 SE | Radeon R9 M395X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Radeon R9 M395X has 66% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R9 M395X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R9 M395X has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M395X - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon R9 M395X - with GCN 3.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 577 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M395X.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M395X - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 450 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M395X.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Battlefield 5 is 152% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 240−250 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 210−220 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 130−140 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 180−190 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 74% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Dota 2 is 55% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Far Cry 5 is 175% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 140−150 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Fortnite is 120% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Forza Horizon 4 is 144% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Grand Theft Auto V is 92% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Metro Exodus is 150% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Minecraft is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 46% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 147% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in World of Tanks is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 SE | Radeon R9 M395X | |
| Architecture | Fermi | GCN 3 |
| Code name | GF104 | Amethyst XT |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 15 November 2010 | 16 October 2014 |
| Pipelines | 288 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 1300 MHz | 723 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | 5,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 31.2 billion/sec | 92.54 |
| Floating-point performance | 748.8 gflops | 2,961 gflops |
| Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 108.8 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | + | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| CUDA cores | 288 | |
| Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | 413 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| TrueAudio | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Number of display connectors | 2 | |
| Check Price |