GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Radeon RX 640
When comparing GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon RX 640, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon RX 640 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
Radeon RX 640 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX 640 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX 640 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 SE | Radeon RX 640 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 50 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 SE has 200% more power consumption, than Radeon RX 640.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon RX 640 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon RX 640 has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX 640 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon RX 640 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 82 MHz higher, than Radeon RX 640.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon RX 640 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 640 is 4300 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Battlefield 5 is 35% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon RX 640 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 30% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Cyberpunk 2077 is 10% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Dota 2 is 22% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Far Cry 5 is 33% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Fortnite is 41% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | − |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Forza Horizon 4 is 50% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | − |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
medium / 720p | − | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Grand Theft Auto V is 34% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Metro Exodus is 80% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Minecraft is 12% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 60% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 70% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in World of Tanks is 20% more, than Radeon RX 640. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 SE | Radeon RX 640 | |
Architecture | Fermi | Polaris |
Code name | GF104 | Polaris 12 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 15 November 2010 | 12 August 2019 |
Pipelines | 288 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 1300 MHz | 1218 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1218 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 2,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 31.2 billion/sec | 38.98 |
Floating-point performance | 748.8 gflops | |
Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 108.8 GB/s | 112.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | |
FreeSync | + | |
CUDA cores | 288 | |
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Number of display connectors | 2 | |
Check Price |