GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Radeon RX Vega 5
When choosing between GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon RX Vega 5, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon RX Vega 5.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
Radeon RX Vega 5 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX Vega 5 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX Vega 5 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 SE | Radeon RX Vega 5 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX Vega 5 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon RX Vega 5 - with Vega.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega 5 - by 7 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 5 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 5 in Battlefield 5 is 47% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon RX Vega 5 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 190−200 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 160−170 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 5 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 5 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 5 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 5 in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 5 in Fortnite is 29% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 5 in Forza Horizon 4 is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 5 in Grand Theft Auto V is 21% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 5 in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 5 in Minecraft is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 5 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 5 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 30−33 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 5 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 29% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 5 in World of Tanks is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 SE | Radeon RX Vega 5 | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Vega |
| Code name | GF104 | Vega |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 15 November 2010 | 7 January 2020 |
| Pipelines | 288 | 320 |
| Core clock speed | 1300 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1400 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 7 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 31.2 billion/sec | |
| Floating-point performance | 748.8 gflops | |
| Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 108.8 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.1 | |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 288 | |
| Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | |
| Number of display connectors | 2 | |
| Check Price |