GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 460 SE will be the best choice, for others Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 SE | Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 - with Vega.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 in Battlefield 5 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 170−180 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 140−150 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 in Dota 2 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 in Far Cry 5 is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 in Fortnite is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 20−22 |
GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 in World of Tanks is 1% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 SE | Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 | |
Architecture | Fermi | Vega |
Code name | GF104 | Vega Raven Ridge |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 15 November 2010 | 7 January 2018 |
Pipelines | 288 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 1300 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 31.2 billion/sec | |
Floating-point performance | 748.8 gflops | |
Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 108.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.1 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 288 | |
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | |
Number of display connectors | 2 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs GeForce GTX 470M
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Quadro M600M
- Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 vs GeForce GTX 470M
- Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 vs Quadro M600M
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Quadro K4000M
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs FirePro M5100
- Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 vs Quadro K4000M
- Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 vs FirePro M5100