GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000
When choosing between GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 SE | Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 - with Vega.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 - by 7 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 75% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 in Battlefield 5 is 94% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 44% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 in Dota 2 is 38% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 in Far Cry 5 is 91% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 in Fortnite is 67% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 77% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 55% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 in Metro Exodus is 75% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 in Minecraft is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 26% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 46% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 70% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 in World of Tanks is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 SE | Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 | |
Architecture | Fermi | Vega |
Code name | GF104 | Vega Renoir |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 15 November 2010 | 7 January 2020 |
Pipelines | 288 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 1300 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1500 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 7 nm |
Texture fill rate | 31.2 billion/sec | |
Floating-point performance | 748.8 gflops | |
Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 108.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.1 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 288 | |
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | |
Number of display connectors | 2 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs GeForce GTX 470M
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Quadro M600M
- Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 vs GeForce GTX 470M
- Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 vs Quadro M600M
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Radeon RX 480 mobile
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs GeForce GTX 590
- Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 vs Radeon RX 480 mobile
- Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 vs GeForce GTX 590