GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Tesla M2070 Q
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 460 SE and Tesla M2070 Q, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 460 SE stacks up against Tesla M2070 Q, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
Tesla M2070 Q
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 SE | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
- Tesla M2070 Q has 50% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Tesla M2070 Q has 5 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE and Tesla M2070 Q are build with Fermi architecture.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 726 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE and Tesla M2070 Q are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
- Tesla M2070 Q is 240 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M2070 Q is 1432 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Battlefield 5 is 72% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 460 SE and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 33% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Dota 2 is 27% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Fortnite is 36% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Forza Horizon 4 is 83% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | − |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Grand Theft Auto V is 40% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Metro Exodus is 120% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Minecraft is 20% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 30% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 85% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 88% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in World of Tanks is 26% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 SE | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Fermi |
| Code name | GF104 | GF100 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 15 November 2010 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 288 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 1300 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 31.2 billion/sec | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 748.8 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
| Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | 248 mm |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz | 3132 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 108.8 GB/s | 150.3 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | + | 2.0 |
| CUDA cores | 288 | |
| Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | 94 Mh/s |
| Number of display connectors | 2 | |