FirePro M5950 vs GeForce GTX 460 v2
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro M5950 and GeForce GTX 460 v2. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro M5950 and GeForce GTX 460 v2. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 460 v2
FirePro M5950 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M5950 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M5950 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M5950 | GeForce GTX 460 v2 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 160 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 has 357% more power consumption, than FirePro M5950.
- FirePro M5950 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and GeForce GTX 460 v2 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro M5950 and GeForce GTX 460 v2 have maximum RAM of 1 GB.
- FirePro M5950 is used in Mobile workstations, and GeForce GTX 460 v2 - in Desktops.
- FirePro M5950 is build with Terascale 2 architecture, and GeForce GTX 460 v2 - with Fermi 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 v2 is 54 MHz higher, than FirePro M5950.
- FirePro M5950 and GeForce GTX 460 v2 are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 v2 is 3108 MHz higher, than FirePro M5950.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 85% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Battlefield 5 is 90% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro M5950 and GeForce GTX 460 v2 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 160−170 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 40% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Dota 2 is 32% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Far Cry 5 is 116% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Fortnite is 45% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Forza Horizon 4 is 63% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Grand Theft Auto V is 52% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Metro Exodus is 80% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Minecraft is 19% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 26% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 62% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 88% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in World of Tanks is 23% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M5950 | GeForce GTX 460 v2 | |
| Architecture | Terascale 2 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Code name | Whistler-XT | GF114 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 13 April 2011 | 24 September 2011 |
| Pipelines | 480 | 336 |
| Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 779 MHz |
| Transistor count | 716 million | 1,950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.40 | 43.62 |
| Floating-point performance | 696.0 gflops | 1,045.6 gflops |
| Length | 210 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 4008 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 57 GB/s | 96.19 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.1 | |
| Bus support | n/a | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 67 Mh/s | 75 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Form factor | MXM-A | |
| Check Price |