FirePro S7000 vs GeForce GTX 460 v2
In this comparison between FirePro S7000 and GeForce GTX 460 v2 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro S7000 will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 460 v2 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro S7000
GeForce GTX 460 v2
Main Specs
| FirePro S7000 | GeForce GTX 460 v2 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 160 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
- FirePro S7000 has 118% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- FirePro S7000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 460 v2 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro S7000 has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FirePro S7000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 460 v2 - with Fermi 2.0.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 171 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- FirePro S7000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 460 v2 - by 40 nm process technology.
- FirePro S7000 is 82 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 792 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 160−170 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
| QHD / 1440p | 95−100 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 50−55 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 170−180 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 62% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 29% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Dota 2 is 52% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Far Cry 5 is 123% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Fortnite is 85% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 116% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 73% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Metro Exodus is 125% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Minecraft is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 34% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 76% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 105% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in World of Tanks is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro S7000 | GeForce GTX 460 v2 | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Code name | Pitcairn | GF114 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 27 August 2012 | 24 September 2011 |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 336 |
| Core clock speed | 950 MHz | 779 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2,800 million | 1,950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 76.00 | 43.62 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,432 gflops | 1,045.6 gflops |
| Length | 292 mm | 210 mm |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | 4008 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | 96.19 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.1 | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 272 Mh/s | 75 Mh/s |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |