FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GTX 460 v2
When comparing FireStream 9250 and GeForce GTX 460 v2, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FireStream 9250 and GeForce GTX 460 v2 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FireStream 9250
GeForce GTX 460 v2
Main Specs
FireStream 9250 | GeForce GTX 460 v2 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 160 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 has 6% more power consumption, than FireStream 9250.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FireStream 9250 and GeForce GTX 460 v2 have maximum RAM of 1 GB.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and GeForce GTX 460 v2 - with Fermi 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 v2 is 154 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 460 v2 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 v2 is 2022 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 160% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Battlefield 5 is 133% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 37% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Dota 2 is 34% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Far Cry 5 is 160% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Fortnite is 66% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Forza Horizon 4 is 100% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | − | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Grand Theft Auto V is 47% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Metro Exodus is 175% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Minecraft is 12% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 41% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 116% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 112% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in World of Tanks is 23% more, than FireStream 9250. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9250 | GeForce GTX 460 v2 | |
Architecture | TeraScale | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | RV770 | GF114 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Release date | 16 June 2008 | 24 September 2011 |
Pipelines | 800 | 336 |
Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 779 MHz |
Transistor count | 956 million | 1,950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 25.00 | 43.62 |
Floating-point performance | 1,000.0 gflops | 1,045.6 gflops |
Length | 210 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1986 MHz | 4008 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 63.55 GB/s | 96.19 GB/s |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 75 Mh/s | |