GeForce GT 650M vs GeForce GTX 460 v2
In this comparison between GeForce GT 650M and GeForce GTX 460 v2 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GT 650M will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 460 v2 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 460 v2
GeForce GT 650M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 650M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 650M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 650M | GeForce GTX 460 v2 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 160 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | DDR3\GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 has 255% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 650M.
- GeForce GT 650M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 460 v2 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GT 650M has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- GeForce GT 650M is used in Laptops, and GeForce GTX 460 v2 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 650M is build with Kepler architecture, and GeForce GTX 460 v2 - with Fermi 2.0.
- GeForce GT 650M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 460 v2 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 v2 is 2208 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 650M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 116% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Battlefield 5 is 109% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 42% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Dota 2 is 25% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Far Cry 5 is 116% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Fortnite is 59% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Forza Horizon 4 is 80% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Grand Theft Auto V is 46% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Metro Exodus is 125% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Minecraft is 12% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 85% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 112% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in World of Tanks is 35% more, than GeForce GT 650M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GT 650M | GeForce GTX 460 v2 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | N13E-GE | GF114 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 22 March 2012 | 24 September 2011 |
Pipelines | 384 | 336 |
Core clock speed | 779 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 900 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 1,950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.62 | |
Floating-point performance | 652.8 gflops | 1,045.6 gflops |
Length | 210 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 - 4000 MHz | 4008 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 96.19 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | + | 2.1 |
CUDA cores | 384 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
HDMI | + | |
HDCP | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
3D Blu-Ray | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 21 Mh/s | 75 Mh/s |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GT 650M vs Radeon RX Vega 6
- GeForce GT 650M vs FireStream 9250
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Radeon RX Vega 6
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs FireStream 9250
- GeForce GT 650M vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
- GeForce GT 650M vs Quadro 5010M
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Quadro 5010M