GeForce GT 750M vs GeForce GTX 460 v2
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GT 750M and GeForce GTX 460 v2. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GT 750M and GeForce GTX 460 v2. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 460 v2
GeForce GT 750M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 750M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 750M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GT 750M | GeForce GTX 460 v2 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 160 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 has 220% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 750M.
- GeForce GT 750M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 460 v2 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GT 750M has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- GeForce GT 750M is used in Laptops, and GeForce GTX 460 v2 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 750M is build with Kepler architecture, and GeForce GTX 460 v2 - with Fermi 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GT 750M is 188 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- GeForce GT 750M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 460 v2 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 v2 is 2008 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 750M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 62% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Battlefield 5 is 61% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GT 750M and GeForce GTX 460 v2 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 160−170 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 31% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Dota 2 is 22% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Far Cry 5 is 44% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Fortnite is 48% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Forza Horizon 4 is 60% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | − | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 45−50 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Grand Theft Auto V is 34% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Metro Exodus is 80% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Minecraft is 12% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 60% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 70% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in World of Tanks is 26% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GT 750M | GeForce GTX 460 v2 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi 2.0 |
| Code name | N14P-GT | GF114 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 April 2013 | 24 September 2011 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 336 |
| Core clock speed | 967 MHz | 779 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 967 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 1,950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.94 | 43.62 |
| Floating-point performance | 742.7 gflops | 1,045.6 gflops |
| Length | 210 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 - 5000 MHz | 4008 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.19 GB/s | 96.19 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | + | 2.1 |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 27 Mh/s | 75 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Standard memory configuration | DDR3/GDDR5 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | + | |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
| Check Price |