GeForce GTX 280 vs GeForce GTX 460 v2
When choosing between GeForce GTX 280 and GeForce GTX 460 v2, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 280 and GeForce GTX 460 v2.
GeForce GTX 280
GeForce GTX 460 v2
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 280 | GeForce GTX 460 v2 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 236 Watt | 160 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | 2x 6-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
- GeForce GTX 280 has 47% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GTX 280 and GeForce GTX 460 v2 have maximum RAM of 1 GB.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 280 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 460 v2 - with Fermi 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 280 is 517 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- GeForce GTX 280 is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 460 v2 - by 40 nm process technology.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is 200 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 280.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 v2 is 2901 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 280.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Battlefield 5 is 155% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 280 and GeForce GTX 460 v2 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 160−170 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 49% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Dota 2 is 37% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Far Cry 5 is 275% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Fortnite is 84% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Forza Horizon 4 is 166% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | − | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Grand Theft Auto V is 93% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Metro Exodus is 266% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Minecraft is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 160% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 185% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in World of Tanks is 29% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 280 | GeForce GTX 460 v2 | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Code name | GT200 | GF114 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 16 June 2008 | 24 September 2011 |
| Pipelines | 240 | 336 |
| Core clock speed | 1296 MHz | 779 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 1,950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 48.2 billion/sec | 43.62 |
| Floating-point performance | 622.1 gflops | 1,045.6 gflops |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | 210 mm |
| Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1107 MHz | 4008 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 141.7 GB/s | 96.19 GB/s |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | + | 2.1 |
| CUDA cores | 240 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 75 Mh/s | |