GeForce GTX 295 vs GeForce GTX 460 v2
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 295 and GeForce GTX 460 v2 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 295 will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 460 v2 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 295
GeForce GTX 460 v2
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 295 | GeForce GTX 460 v2 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | 160 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | 2x 6-pin |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
- GeForce GTX 295 has 80% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1791 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 295 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 460 v2 - with Fermi 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 463 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 460 v2 - by 40 nm process technology.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is 200 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 295.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 v2 is 3009 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 295.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 116% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Battlefield 5 is 109% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 295 and GeForce GTX 460 v2 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 46% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Dota 2 is 34% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Fortnite is 59% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Forza Horizon 4 is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | − | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Grand Theft Auto V is 55% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Metro Exodus is 125% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Minecraft is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 62% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in World of Tanks is 35% more, than GeForce GTX 295. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 295 | GeForce GTX 460 v2 | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | GT200B | GF114 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Release date | 8 January 2009 | 24 September 2011 |
Pipelines | 240 | 336 |
Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | 779 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 1,950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | 43.62 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | 1,045.6 gflops |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | 210 mm |
Memory bus width | 896 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | 4008 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | 96.19 GB/s |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | + | 2.1 |
CUDA cores | 480 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 75 Mh/s | |
CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon R9 M275
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Radeon R9 M275
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Quadro 5010M
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Quadro 5010M