GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs GeForce GTX 480M
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 460 v2 and GeForce GTX 480M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 460 v2 will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 480M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 460 v2
GeForce GTX 480M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 480M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 480M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 v2 | GeForce GTX 480M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 has 60% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 480M.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 480M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 480M has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 480M - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 480M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 480M is 71 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 and GeForce GTX 480M are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 v2 is 2808 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 480M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| GeForce GTX 460 v2 and GeForce GTX 480M have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 480M in Battlefield 5 is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 460 v2 and GeForce GTX 480M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 170−180 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 140−150 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 480M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| GeForce GTX 460 v2 and GeForce GTX 480M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 480M in Dota 2 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 480M in Far Cry 5 is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 480M in Fortnite is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 480M in Forza Horizon 4 is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 460 v2 and GeForce GTX 480M have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| GeForce GTX 460 v2 and GeForce GTX 480M have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
| GeForce GTX 460 v2 and GeForce GTX 480M have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 20−22 |
| GeForce GTX 460 v2 and GeForce GTX 480M have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| GeForce GTX 460 v2 and GeForce GTX 480M have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| GeForce GTX 460 v2 and GeForce GTX 480M have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 480M in World of Tanks is 1% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 v2 | GeForce GTX 480M | |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Fermi |
| Code name | GF114 | N11E-GTX-A3 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 24 September 2011 | 25 May 2010 |
| Pipelines | 336 | 352 |
| Core clock speed | 779 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 43.62 | 18.7 billion/sec |
| Floating-point performance | 1,045.6 gflops | 598.4 gflops |
| Length | 210 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 96.19 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 API |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.1 | + |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 75 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |