GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs GeForce GTX 670M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 460 v2 and GeForce GTX 670M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 460 v2 and GeForce GTX 670M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 460 v2
GeForce GTX 670M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 670M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 670M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | GeForce GTX 670M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 3 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 has 113% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 670M.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 670M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 670M has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 670M - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 670M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 v2 is 181 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670M.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 and GeForce GTX 670M are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 v2 is 2508 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 30% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Battlefield 5 is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 460 v2 and GeForce GTX 670M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Dota 2 is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Far Cry 5 is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Fortnite is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Forza Horizon 4 is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Grand Theft Auto V is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Metro Exodus is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Minecraft is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 30−33 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | GeForce GTX 670M | |
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Fermi |
Code name | GF114 | N13E-GS1-LP |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 24 September 2011 | 22 March 2012 |
Pipelines | 336 | 336 |
Core clock speed | 779 MHz | 598 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 1,950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.62 | 33.5 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 1,045.6 gflops | 803.7 gflops |
Length | 210 mm | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 192bit |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 96.19 GB/s | 72.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 API |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | 2.1 | + |
CUDA cores | 336 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
HDCP | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 75 Mh/s | 53 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |