GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs GeForce GTX 765M
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 460 v2 and GeForce GTX 765M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 460 v2 will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 765M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 460 v2
GeForce GTX 765M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 765M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 765M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | GeForce GTX 765M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 has 113% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 765M.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 765M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 765M has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 765M - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 765M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 765M is 71 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 765M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 v2 is 2008 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 765M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
GeForce GTX 460 v2 and GeForce GTX 765M have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 460 v2 and GeForce GTX 765M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
GeForce GTX 460 v2 and GeForce GTX 765M have the same average FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
GeForce GTX 460 v2 and GeForce GTX 765M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
GeForce GTX 460 v2 and GeForce GTX 765M have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Far Cry 5 is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
GeForce GTX 460 v2 and GeForce GTX 765M have the same average FPS in Fortnite. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
GeForce GTX 460 v2 and GeForce GTX 765M have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 460 v2 and GeForce GTX 765M have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
GeForce GTX 460 v2 and GeForce GTX 765M have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
GeForce GTX 460 v2 and GeForce GTX 765M have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 20−22 |
GeForce GTX 460 v2 and GeForce GTX 765M have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
GeForce GTX 460 v2 and GeForce GTX 765M have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
GeForce GTX 460 v2 and GeForce GTX 765M have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
GeForce GTX 460 v2 and GeForce GTX 765M have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | GeForce GTX 765M | |
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Kepler |
Code name | GF114 | N14-GE |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 24 September 2011 | 30 May 2013 |
Pipelines | 336 | 768 |
Core clock speed | 779 MHz | 850 MHz |
Boost Clock | 863 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 2,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.62 | 55.23 |
Floating-point performance | 1,045.6 gflops | 1,326 gflops |
Length | 210 mm | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 96.19 GB/s | 64.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 API |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 2.1 | + |
CUDA cores | 768 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 75 Mh/s | 24 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Quadro 5010M
- GeForce GTX 765M vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
- GeForce GTX 765M vs Quadro 5010M
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Quadro 5000
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Mobility Radeon HD 4870 X2
- GeForce GTX 765M vs Quadro 5000
- GeForce GTX 765M vs Mobility Radeon HD 4870 X2