GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs GeForce MX230
When choosing between GeForce GTX 460 v2 and GeForce MX230, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 460 v2 and GeForce MX230.
GeForce GTX 460 v2
GeForce MX230 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX230 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX230 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 v2 | GeForce MX230 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 10 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 has 1500% more power consumption, than GeForce MX230.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce MX230 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce MX230 has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is used in Desktops, and GeForce MX230 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and GeForce MX230 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX230 is 740 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce MX230 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX230 is 2992 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 8% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Battlefield 5 is 10% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 460 v2 and GeForce MX230 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 160−170 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 2% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| GeForce GTX 460 v2 and GeForce MX230 have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Far Cry 5 is 8% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Fortnite is 2% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| GeForce GTX 460 v2 and GeForce MX230 have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 460 v2 and GeForce MX230 have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| GeForce GTX 460 v2 and GeForce MX230 have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
| GeForce GTX 460 v2 and GeForce MX230 have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 20−22 |
| GeForce GTX 460 v2 and GeForce MX230 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| GeForce GTX 460 v2 and GeForce MX230 have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| GeForce GTX 460 v2 and GeForce MX230 have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| GeForce GTX 460 v2 and GeForce MX230 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 v2 | GeForce MX230 | |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Pascal |
| Code name | GF114 | N17S-G0 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 24 September 2011 | 20 February 2019 |
| Pipelines | 336 | 256 |
| Core clock speed | 779 MHz | 1519 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1531 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | 1,800 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 43.62 | 25.31 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,045.6 gflops | |
| Length | 210 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | 7000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 96.19 GB/s | 48.06 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 2.1 | + |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 75 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |