GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs GRID M60 8Q
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 460 v2 and GRID M60 8Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 460 v2 will be the best choice, for others GRID M60 8Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 460 v2
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GRID M60 8Q
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | GRID M60 8Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
- GRID M60 8Q has 40% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GRID M60 8Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GRID M60 8Q has 7 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and GRID M60 8Q - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 v2 is 222 MHz higher, than GRID M60 8Q.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GRID M60 8Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- GRID M60 8Q is 57 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M60 8Q is 1004 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 84% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 95% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 85−90 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 45−50 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 160−170 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 56% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 29% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Dota 2 is 45% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Fortnite is 80% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 94% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 68% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Minecraft is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 34% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 61% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 94% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in World of Tanks is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | GRID M60 8Q | |
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | GF114 | GM204 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Release date | 24 September 2011 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 336 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 779 MHz | 557 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.62 | 150.8 |
Floating-point performance | 1,045.6 gflops | 4,833 gflops |
Length | 210 mm | 267 mm |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 96.19 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 2.1 | 5.2 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 75 Mh/s | |