GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs HD Graphics 5000
When choosing between GeForce GTX 460 v2 and HD Graphics 5000, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 460 v2 and HD Graphics 5000.
GeForce GTX 460 v2
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
HD Graphics 5000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: HD Graphics 5000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with HD Graphics 5000 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | HD Graphics 5000 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 30 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 has 433% more power consumption, than HD Graphics 5000.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and HD Graphics 5000 uses PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is used in Desktops, and HD Graphics 5000 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and HD Graphics 5000 - with Gen. 7.5 Haswell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 v2 is 579 MHz higher, than HD Graphics 5000.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and HD Graphics 5000 - by 22 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 183% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Battlefield 5 is 360% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 5000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 20−22 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 75% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
GeForce GTX 460 v2 and HD Graphics 5000 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Dota 2 is 62% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Far Cry 5 is 400% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Fortnite is 115% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Forza Horizon 4 is 280% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | − |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Grand Theft Auto V is 126% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Metro Exodus is 1100% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Minecraft is 22% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 52% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 533% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | − |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 733% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in World of Tanks is 55% more, than HD Graphics 5000. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | HD Graphics 5000 | |
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Gen. 7.5 Haswell |
Code name | GF114 | Haswell GT3 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 24 September 2011 | 5 June 2013 |
Pipelines | 336 | 40 |
Core clock speed | 779 MHz | 200 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 1,300 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 22 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.62 | 44.00 |
Floating-point performance | 1,045.6 gflops | |
Length | 210 mm | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 96.19 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.80 |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 75 Mh/s | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |