GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Iris Graphics 5100
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Iris Graphics 5100 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 460 v2 will be the best choice, for others Iris Graphics 5100 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 460 v2
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Iris Graphics 5100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 5100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 5100 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Iris Graphics 5100 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 30 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 has 433% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 5100.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Graphics 5100 uses PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is used in Desktops, and Iris Graphics 5100 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Iris Graphics 5100 - with Gen. 7.5 Haswell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 v2 is 579 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 5100.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Iris Graphics 5100 - by 22 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 116% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Battlefield 5 is 110% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 40% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Dota 2 is 37% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Far Cry 5 is 160% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Fortnite is 59% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Forza Horizon 4 is 90% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | − |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Grand Theft Auto V is 63% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Metro Exodus is 175% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
4K / 2160p | − | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Minecraft is 14% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 30% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 62% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 142% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in World of Tanks is 26% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Iris Graphics 5100 | |
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Gen. 7.5 Haswell |
Code name | GF114 | Haswell GT3 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 24 September 2011 | 5 June 2013 |
Pipelines | 336 | 40 |
Core clock speed | 779 MHz | 200 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 1,300 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 22 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.62 | 48.00 |
Floating-point performance | 1,045.6 gflops | |
Length | 210 mm | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 96.19 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.80 |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 75 Mh/s | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Quadro 5010M
- Iris Graphics 5100 vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
- Iris Graphics 5100 vs Quadro 5010M
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Quadro 3000M
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Mobility Radeon HD 4850
- Iris Graphics 5100 vs Quadro 3000M
- Iris Graphics 5100 vs Mobility Radeon HD 4850