GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Iris Graphics 540
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Iris Graphics 540 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 460 v2 will be the best choice, for others Iris Graphics 540 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 460 v2
Iris Graphics 540 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 540 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 540 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Iris Graphics 540 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | eDRAM |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 64 MB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 has 966% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 540.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Graphics 540 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- Iris Graphics 540 has 63 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is used in Desktops, and Iris Graphics 540 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Iris Graphics 540 - with Gen. 9 Skylake.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 v2 is 479 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 540.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Iris Graphics 540 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 18% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Battlefield 5 is 10% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Iris Graphics 540 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 5% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Dota 2 is 7% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Far Cry 5 is 8% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Fortnite is 6% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Forza Horizon 4 is 12% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Grand Theft Auto V is 8% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Metro Exodus is 14% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Minecraft is 4% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 9% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 8% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 6% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Iris Graphics 540 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Iris Graphics 540 | |
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Gen. 9 Skylake |
Code name | GF114 | Skylake GT3e |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 24 September 2011 | 1 September 2015 |
Pipelines | 336 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 779 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.62 | 50.40 |
Floating-point performance | 1,045.6 gflops | |
Length | 210 mm | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 96.19 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.97 |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 75 Mh/s | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Quadro 5010M
- Iris Graphics 540 vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
- Iris Graphics 540 vs Quadro 5010M
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs GeForce GTX 460M SLI
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs GeForce MX150
- Iris Graphics 540 vs GeForce GTX 460M SLI
- Iris Graphics 540 vs GeForce MX150