GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Iris Pro Graphics 5200. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Iris Pro Graphics 5200. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 460 v2
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 45 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | eDRAM |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 128 MB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 has 255% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 uses PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 127 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - with Gen. 7.5 Haswell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 v2 is 579 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - by 22 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 8% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Battlefield 5 is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 2% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Dota 2 is 1% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Far Cry 5 is 8% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Fortnite is 2% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Forza Horizon 4 is 5% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Grand Theft Auto V is 5% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Minecraft is 2% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 4% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 8% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 6% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | |
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Gen. 7.5 Haswell |
Code name | GF114 | Haswell GT3e |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 24 September 2011 | 5 June 2013 |
Pipelines | 336 | 40 |
Core clock speed | 779 MHz | 200 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1300 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 392 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 22 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.62 | 52.00 |
Floating-point performance | 1,045.6 gflops | 104.0 gflops |
Length | 210 mm | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 96.19 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.80 |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 75 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Quadro 5010M
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Quadro 5010M
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Radeon RX 550X
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon RX 550X
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book