GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Quadro FX 3800
When choosing between GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Quadro FX 3800, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Quadro FX 3800.
GeForce GTX 460 v2
Quadro FX 3800
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Quadro FX 3800 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 108 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 has 48% more power consumption, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Quadro FX 3800 have maximum RAM of 1 GB.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Quadro FX 3800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 v2 is 179 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 3800 - by 55 nm process technology.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is 12 mm longer, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 v2 is 2408 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 183% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Battlefield 5 is 475% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 83% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Quadro FX 3800 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Dota 2 is 70% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Far Cry 5 is 466% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Fortnite is 139% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Forza Horizon 4 is 300% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | − |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Grand Theft Auto V is 126% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Metro Exodus is 1800% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Minecraft is 20% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 50% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 850% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | − |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 733% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in World of Tanks is 55% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Quadro FX 3800 | |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | GF114 | GT200B |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 24 September 2011 | 30 March 2009 |
| Pipelines | 336 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 779 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 43.62 | 38.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,045.6 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
| Length | 210 mm | 198 mm |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 96.19 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.1 | 1.3 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 75 Mh/s | |