GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Quadro FX 4800
When comparing GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Quadro FX 4800, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Quadro FX 4800 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 460 v2
Quadro FX 4800
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Quadro FX 4800 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1536 MB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 has 6% more power consumption, than Quadro FX 4800.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Quadro FX 4800 has 1535 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Quadro FX 4800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 v2 is 177 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 4800 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Quadro FX 4800 is 57 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 v2 is 2408 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Battlefield 5 is 187% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 51% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Quadro FX 4800 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Dota 2 is 45% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Far Cry 5 is 225% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Fortnite is 84% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Forza Horizon 4 is 137% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | − |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Grand Theft Auto V is 72% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Metro Exodus is 266% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Minecraft is 16% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 216% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 240% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in World of Tanks is 39% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Quadro FX 4800 | |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | GF114 | GT200B |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 24 September 2011 | 11 November 2008 |
| Pipelines | 336 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 779 MHz | 602 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 43.62 | 38.53 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,045.6 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
| Length | 210 mm | 267 mm |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 96.19 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.1 | 1.3 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 75 Mh/s | |